Conversations with Corporate Decision Makers #4 Voluntary Programs
So, you've defined your carbon footprint and purhcased green power; what next? This conversation will discuss a few different options for reporting your entity's actions.
Him/Her: Hey, thanks for sitting down with us today.
Me: My pleasure.
Him/Her: We've defined our carbon footprint for our 25 US facilities and have made 20% of our energy consumption green by purchasing RECs. You've also helped us qualify for the EPA Green Power Partnership; so what's next.
Me: The next step is reporting your emissions. You have a few choices:
1. US DOE Voluntary Reporting Program 1605(b)
2. California Climate Registry
3. EPA Climate Leaders
4. WWF Climate Savers
Him/Her: Ok, could you quickly discuss each one?
Me: Sure.
1. US DOE 1605(b) - This program is probably the most underutilized of the four choices. It gives industrial companies a means for differentiating themselves, as it actually rates your overall carbon emissions measurement and quantification methodologies. The more direct your company is (by using CEMS - Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems) the more robust your results will be. In my opinion this options is more attractive for industrial polluters who may have invested more capital in their monitoring technology and want to receive credit for their efforts.
2. California Climate Registry - This program is the most appropriate for large office based organizations and entities with offices located in California. It is important to understand that you need not have any facilities in the state of California to register your emissions. It is also important to understand that California will likely merge with RGGI (and possibly preempt the federal government and join Kyoto). This means that early voluntary actions now will likely have a real financial benefit once allowances are doled out beginning Jan. 1 2012. Also, California Climate Registry requires 3rd party verification - which is integral to the process of carbon trading.
3. EPA Climate Leaders - This program is very similar to the California Climate Registry, but will not result in trading benefits. This has been the standard for US corporations for the last few years, but CCR is likely to replace it.
4. WWF Climate Savers - This program focuses more on helping its participants become more active in reducing emissions, but the formal reporting program will not likely be as robust as the CCR. The first six participants in the WWF Climate Savers were International Business Machines (IBM), Johnson & Johnson, Polaroid Corporation, Nike, Lafarge, The Collins Companies, and Sagawa Express.
Him/Her: Which program would you suggest for us?
Me: Well, since over 90% of businesses carbon emissions are from office/facility occupation and not direct combustion or industrial process emission - I would suggest California Climate Registry. The program is robust, user friendly, and will likely become a part of the national reporting system in the US.
Him/Her: Ok, thank you. Next time could we talk about the steps and time horizons involved with reporting emissions to California Climate Registry.
Me: Absolutely.
So, you've defined your carbon footprint and purhcased green power; what next? This conversation will discuss a few different options for reporting your entity's actions.
Him/Her: Hey, thanks for sitting down with us today.
Me: My pleasure.
Him/Her: We've defined our carbon footprint for our 25 US facilities and have made 20% of our energy consumption green by purchasing RECs. You've also helped us qualify for the EPA Green Power Partnership; so what's next.
Me: The next step is reporting your emissions. You have a few choices:
1. US DOE Voluntary Reporting Program 1605(b)
2. California Climate Registry
3. EPA Climate Leaders
4. WWF Climate Savers
Him/Her: Ok, could you quickly discuss each one?
Me: Sure.
1. US DOE 1605(b) - This program is probably the most underutilized of the four choices. It gives industrial companies a means for differentiating themselves, as it actually rates your overall carbon emissions measurement and quantification methodologies. The more direct your company is (by using CEMS - Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems) the more robust your results will be. In my opinion this options is more attractive for industrial polluters who may have invested more capital in their monitoring technology and want to receive credit for their efforts.
2. California Climate Registry - This program is the most appropriate for large office based organizations and entities with offices located in California. It is important to understand that you need not have any facilities in the state of California to register your emissions. It is also important to understand that California will likely merge with RGGI (and possibly preempt the federal government and join Kyoto). This means that early voluntary actions now will likely have a real financial benefit once allowances are doled out beginning Jan. 1 2012. Also, California Climate Registry requires 3rd party verification - which is integral to the process of carbon trading.
3. EPA Climate Leaders - This program is very similar to the California Climate Registry, but will not result in trading benefits. This has been the standard for US corporations for the last few years, but CCR is likely to replace it.
4. WWF Climate Savers - This program focuses more on helping its participants become more active in reducing emissions, but the formal reporting program will not likely be as robust as the CCR. The first six participants in the WWF Climate Savers were International Business Machines (IBM), Johnson & Johnson, Polaroid Corporation, Nike, Lafarge, The Collins Companies, and Sagawa Express.
Him/Her: Which program would you suggest for us?
Me: Well, since over 90% of businesses carbon emissions are from office/facility occupation and not direct combustion or industrial process emission - I would suggest California Climate Registry. The program is robust, user friendly, and will likely become a part of the national reporting system in the US.
Him/Her: Ok, thank you. Next time could we talk about the steps and time horizons involved with reporting emissions to California Climate Registry.
Me: Absolutely.
Labels: California Climate Registry, carbon footprint, carbon offsets, carbon risk, carbon trading, epa climate leaders, green power, US DOE 1605(b), WWF Climate Savers
posted by CarbonTrader at 8:00 AM
4 Comments:
Moving can be made easy, just when companies start to treat your move like theirs. This is one of the main reasons why Americans are dealing with the stress while they are making their move. We are just there to help you with your Change Of Address
Thanks for sharing this great blog. I wonder how all of this has affected the solar panels industry over the last decade.
Paystub generator, which has now become a famous term among employers, employees, and consultants, is an extraordinary method to get your income confirmed. You may wonder that for what reason you need somebody's endorsement on your income statement; however, there are times when you need to.
https://stubsondemand.com/paystub-generator/
Moving can be made easy, just when companies start to treat your move like theirs. This is one of the main reasons why Americans are dealing with the stress while they are making their move. However, it is not recommended for person physically go to the shops for book supplies. Hence there is a need for online book shops such as https://kitaabnow.com
Post a Comment
<< Home